the dream is real

On the side of a bus, the new poster for Inception says “The dream is real.”

Tantalizing movie tag-lines aside, I decided to pose the exact opposite.

The real is a dream.

And then I played with a thought experiment:

You sitting in morning traffic is a dream.

Working a job (you may, or may not enjoy) is a dream.

Status is a dream.

“I have to” is a dream.

Judging others is a dream.

“I’m not good enough” is a dream.

Depression is a dream.

“I can’t make a difference” is a dream.

The War on Terror is a dream.

Happiness is a dream.

A cold meaningless universe is a dream.

Fear is a dream.

You are a dream.

Only love is real.

Posted in Personal Musings, Philosophy · Tagged , · 3 Comments

Inception

Funny enough, it’s been 11 years since The Matrix was released, first asking the masses “what is reality?” The answer, at least according to the Wachowskis Bros, is that reality is a ruined world conquered by robots.

Enter: Inception, the new film from Christopher Nolan.

Like many, I’ve been a fan of his work since Memento, and was eager to see his latest return to the mind-bending genre. Rather than offer a general review, I’ll leave that to the other bloggers and The New York Times. Instead, I’ll share relevant thoughts about the film’s major theme.

“At the heart of the movie is the notion that an idea is indeed the most resilient and powerful parasite. A trace of it will always be there in your mind…somewhere. ” – Christopher Nolan

Dom Cobb, the film’s protagonist, is the best “extractor” there is – he has the ability to steal ideas from other people’s subconscious. But aside from corporate espionage, we also learn he spent much time with his wife in their own deep subconscious realms – co-creating an artificial reality.

The power of creation is a gift. We do it every day, whether we’re aware of it or not.

Dom and his wife spin their own fantasy world, filled with their own imagination and memories. Unfortunately, the nature of fantasy is that it isn’t real. Dom realizes this, and attempts to wake up from the dream. His wife chooses to remain lost, forcing him to take more drastic measures.

Don’t worry, I won’t offer any spoilers. But I do believe this potent love story is the heart of Inception.

Whereas The Matrix asked “what is reality?” this film asks “what is meaningful?” In their dream world, Dom and his wife were able to create anything they desired – but ultimately, it’s a false reality. And it’s impossible to create meaning in a meaningless world.

You might assert that the “real” world is just as meaningless; therefore the false reality is just as valid. In response, I can only offer: if you can’t find magic in the real world, you’re not looking hard enough.

Posted in Films, Philosophy · Tagged , , · Leave a comment

Rationality vs Intuition


A decomposing bird carcass, filled with plastic pollution on Midway Island. Photo: Chris Jordan

In 2008, worldwide consumption of bottled water surpassed 52 billion gallons. 86% of these bottles will not be recycled, but will rest in a landfill.

Should you care?

Rationally, there’s no reason to care. The bottles will be buried and mostly out of sight. Besides, with the human population exploding, and the developing world hungry to consume as much as the rest of us, humanity is doomed anyway.

In my recent interview with Charles Eisenstein, he shares much the same conclusion:

It is quite irrational to believe things will ever be much better than they are today. When you really study the situation the world is in, you realize that it is going to take a miracle, lots of miracles, so save us. The situation is quite hopeless, from a rational standpoint.

On the surface, that’s pretty depressing – and it’s fairly easy to give up and decide to carry on with “business as usual.”

But every so often, when we catch moments of stillness, when we relax the cold logic of rationality, we touch upon the beauty of intuition.

It’s intuition that grips our hearts when we view images like the one above, revealing the brutal effects of plastic pollution on wildlife. There’s something about it that feels… wrong.

It is the same feeling that demands we phrase the Gulf “oil spill” for what it truly is. As Naomi Klein writes:

The hole at the bottom of the ocean is more than an engineering accident or a broken machine. It is a violent wound in a living organism; that it is part of us.

It is the feeling that we are more intimately connected than we’ve been led to believe. Eisenstein describes this connection:

I think we know in our hearts that we have the power to create a beautiful world. It will only happen, though, if we listen to our heart’s knowing enough to actually carry out the actions necessary.

We are called to live according to what our hearts know. That is the only sure guide. That is also a true revolution.

The mental calculations we call ethics, minimizing your carbon footprint, etc., none of those are a sure guide. Like, should I fly to California to co-create a transformational event? Well, it burns a lot of jet fuel. How can I possibly add up all the costs and benefits? It is impossible.

When we try to choose from the head, we get into a maze of indecision, and even when we do choose we have no certainty and no courage. So now it is time to listen to our heart knowing.

Posted in Green, Philosophy · Tagged , · 2 Comments

The Trance

“For three hundred fifty years, people in the Western world have convinced themselves that they live in a bleak world of dead matter spinning in empty space, when the real universe all around them is aflame with magic and power and infinite life. We need to wake up from the trance of scientific materialism and embrace …the dancing powers that surround us at every moment.” — John Michael Greer

Posted in Philosophy, Quotes · Leave a comment

Conflict

I type this from a tiny home in the Boquete hills, within the rolling jungles of Panama. I type and the rain continues to fall outside.

One of the defining beliefs about the human story is that of conflict. If you’re ever in doubt, watch any mainstream film, or read any fictional book. Humans thrive on the emotion, passion, anger, fear, and courage of conflict. Its seems written into our DNA.

We look out at the world and we see conflict. Nation against nation. People against people, struggling to horde dwindling resources amid a changing climate. Even in nature, we look and find conflict: survival of the fittest. Only the strong survive.

The silver lining is that through conflict, we find wisdom. Therefore, the conflict was worth it. Necessary even. Conflict is a means to an end.

But what if the truth was different? What if wisdom actually came from release?

In the 1999 film, American Beauty, Lester Burnham is transformed from mild-mannered suburbanite to pot smoking, burger flipping, super hero, finally in control of his own destiny once again.

He finds inspiration (and escape) in the teenage beauty of Angela Heyes. She becomes his muse and desired mistress. Lester challenges himself to win her over, and the conflict is set.

Throughout the film, he lusts after her, in dreams and reality. His attachment is clear.

Yet, it’s not until the end of the film, when he finally undresses her, and the moment he desired for so long is offered. She reveals it’s her first time: she’s a virgin. And suddenly, Lester realizes she is no longer his mysterious muse… she is a scared child.

His reaction isn’t anger, or disillusionment. In fact, it’s release.

He let’s go of his attachment to what she represents: his own inner fulfillment. He let’s go of his resentment towards his cheating wife, he let’s go of his attachment to things and the trappings of consumerism.

He let’s go of it all, and finds peace.

His last words before the film fades out, as the camera pans over the rooftops of suburbia:

“I guess I could be really pissed off about what happened to me…but it’s hard to stay mad, when there’s so much beauty in the world. Sometimes I feel like I’m seeing it all at once, and it’s too much, my heart fills up like a balloon that’s about to burst…and then I remember to relax, and stop trying to hold on to it, and then it flows through me like rain.

And I can’t feel anything but gratitude for every single moment of my stupid little life.”

Posted in Philosophy · Tagged , , · Leave a comment

The Truth About Human Nature?

Jeremy Rifkin investigates the evolution of empathy and the ways that it has shaped our society. (Plus, it has some great sketching)

The one part of the video that I find problematic is the view that hunter-gatherer life was only based on blood ties. It ignores the likely reality that humans viewed themselves as part of the great cosmology of life – hence were connected to more than other humans.

This gives further evidence that our current view of human nature, one laced with greed, conflict, and war, is in fact not our true nature.

Posted in Philosophy · Tagged , · 2 Comments

A Lament For Childhood

On one hand, I can count the number of times I’ve cried as adult.

Does that seem odd? We are surrounded by a constant bombardment of misery, suffering, and pain, and yet I’ve only been moved to tears a handful of times.

I wonder – does it speak to my inability to feel emotion? Or the success of the unreality…the banality…of the violence around me?

In 2005, after completing a 10 day Vipassana retreat, I arrived home. After 10 days without external stimuli, without even speaking, I was suddenly thrust back into the world, and coincidentally, Hurricane Katrina.

I watched as stories poured in of the destruction; homes flooded, bodies buried, families torn apart. Yet it wasn’t until I saw a rescue worker interviewed on CNN telling the news anchor about an elderly woman left in her hospital bed as the waters rose. She couldn’t escape the facility herself, but had access to a phone. The rescue worker, visibly shaken, related how he kept in contact with her over the phone. “Someone is coming,” he told her. “We will save you.”

As the rescue worker broke down, the news anchor shifted uncomfortably. “No one came to save her…” said the worker, now in tears. “The water came and she was alone. No one came to save her…”

The anchor abruptly ended the interview – unable to give acknowledgment to the pain of tragedy. No…far better to move on to the next story. The next tragedy.

I wept in his place.

Today I cried again. Today, I realized another great tragedy, what Charles Eisenstein calls The Great Robbery:

The anger of the teenager is the indignation of the dispossessed. The Great Robbery is first and foremost the pillage of their childhood. Childhood is supposed to be a realm of exploration in which we discover our passions, our selves, our life purpose. What we get instead is enslavement to schedules and obligations.

Childhood is supposed to be a time of play. And what is play? Play is something far different from what we, in a degenerate age, call fun—the consumption of entertainment. Play is supposed to be nothing less than practice in creating the world. Its highest expression is “deep play”, the kind which unfolds over days and weeks.

In deep play, children create entire worlds of the imagination, in which toys are but props. In so doing, they prepare themselves for an adulthood empowered in the divine function of world-creation.

He continues:

An equally grave loss is the loss of our passion and purpose. Bereft of the chance to explore our inner world, we grow up not truly knowing what we love or what we want to make of our lives. In the absence of a passion, we easily accept the range of available substitutes. I might as well be an engineer. Maybe I’ll major in finance. That might be okay. I’ll get a good job at least. Ask someone thus dispossessed what they really love, what makes their heart sing, and they won’t even know.

If you accept that the purpose of life is indeed merely to get by, to survive, to get a secure job with benefits, get married, have kids, retire securely, grow old and die, then perhaps this result isn’t so tragic. But if the adolescent intuition is true, that we are indeed here on earth for a magnificent purpose, then the cutoff from our passion is a terrible crime.

What does your heart tell you?

I cried because my heart tells me this is the truth. I see it in the pervasive mechanisms all around me – friends without purpose, surrendering their spark for an insidious lie.

Here is the right message—and it applies equally to the suicidal teenager as well as to the commonly resentful. The message is that what you have always secretly suspected is true.

The world is not supposed to be like this. Your intuitions of something more beautiful are valid. You are meant for an amazing, divine purpose. You are brilliant, possessed of unique gifts just waiting to be discovered. And—very important—anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. Worse than lying, they are stealing from you.

Much has been stolen already, but there is one thing no one can ever steal (though you might put it aside, temporarily) and that is your soul knowledge of the message I have just related. What’s more, it is possible to recover all that has been lost. It might take time, but no one is a helpless victim.

All we need is to reconnect with the power we already have.

It is the power, first and foremost, to say no. You have been exercising that power all along, in fact, but when you begin to see the source of the betrayal, when you begin to see through the lies that construct the lesser life and lesser world that most of us have grudgingly accepted, then that power is multiplied a thousandfold. You have the power to withdraw, not through the unconscious mechanisms of laziness, depression or suicide, but consciously, mindfully.

And then, in the empty space that you create for yourself, begin to play. Begin to do what you enjoy, without having to justify it to anyone. From this starting point you will discover meaning, passion, and life, and you will become indominable.

Posted in Personal Musings · Tagged , · 19 Comments

There Is No Other

In my last post, I wrote about the problem with rampant consumption. Particularly, how all we appear to know is how to feed the “Machine.”

It’s tempting to describe the Machine as familiar objects of scorn: big corporations, white men, society, the Illuminati, etc… but when you do that, you’re easily laughed off by the mainstream.

It’s become the ultimate cliche… “evil corporations” hell bent on making as much money as possible, staffed by fat-cat rich folk, always eager to trod on the lower classes.

That’s too simplistic, people say. Society is much more complex than that.

And it’s true: there are many reasons we (humanity) find ourselves in this predicament. Rampant war, dwindling resources, and climate change.

But when you ask where terrorists come from, they’ll give you a simple answer. “They’re extremist radicals, hell-bent on ending the Western way of life. They hate our freedom!”

How is it that one simple answer is more acceptable then the other?

In the wake of the Moscow bombings, President Dmitry Medvedev urged “harsher measures” to crack down on terrorism.

And yet, the bombing itself appears at least partially motivated by the killing of innocent civilians by government forces a few weeks earlier.

Then, four garlic pickers died along with 18 suspected Islamic militants in a three-day shootout in the mountainous forests that straddle two other North Caucasus provinces, Ingushetia and Chechnya.

The Memorial rights group on Saturday said the four were villagers caught in the crossfire and then dragged away and executed while gathering the wild shoots to sell at local markets.

“That shooting was just lunacy,” said Alexander Cherkasov, a Memorial spokesman. “And that lunacy was used to justify terrorism.”

Seems like a complex issue, and yet… also very simple: violence always creates more violence.

But why do we continue to get this simple equation wrong again and again? Bhikkhu Bodhi, an American Buddhist, identifies the problem lies with our understanding of peace.

“We think that peace means the absence of conflict; thus we try to gain peace by subduing our opponents and by bullying our environment to serve our desires, unaware that this process is ultimately self-destructive.”

I believe it’s also what Haruki Murakami meant when he said he’s “always on the side of the egg.”

No matter the side you identify with: the Right or the Left, the activists or the corporations, the fringe or the mainstream; it’s no longer about creating an enemy. Having an “other” different from you is a symptom of dualistic thinking that has created untold misery for millions.

As Ralph Waldo Trine writes in “In Tune With The Infinite“:

“The truly wise man or woman will recognize no one as an enemy.”

Posted in Philosophy · Tagged , , · 1 Comment